All Conservation Announcements

A Major Conservation Victory Announced

Friday, May 9th, 2008

Tejon Ranch Oakland SavannahThis week Audubon California announced a major conservation victory resulting from 20 months of negotiations between Tejon Ranch officials and representatives of Audubon California and other conservation-minded organizations.

In this agreement, 240,000 acres (90%) of the mammoth Tejon Ranch in Kern and Los Angeles counties will be set aside as a preserve of spectacular and ecologically significant California wildlands.

For more about this story, read here.

Hansen Dam Use - An Open Letter

Monday, April 28th, 2008

To Whom It May Concern:

The San Fernando Valley Audubon Society and Los Angeles Audubon Society are California non profit corporations with 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, and certified chapters of National Audubon Society. Our mission is to enjoy and protect birds and their habitat through recreation, education, conservation and restoration. We have recently become aware of the War Horse and Militaria Heritage Foundation’s proposal to create a multiple use equestrian park within the boundaries of the larger Hansen Dam Recreation area, adjacent to the Tujunga Wash. While our organizations do not object to the creation of such a facility, we are opposed to the War Horse and Militaria Foundation’s first choice of siting—East of Gabrieleno Park, under the Edison Power Lines and on the land to the East of the power line.

Hansen Dam has been identified as an Audubon California Important Bird Area (IBA), a national designation which acknowledges its biodiversity. Its unique mix of habitat for birds include coastal sage scrub and alluvial scrub, a very rare habitat limited to southwestern California with bird community similar to that of coastal sage scrub. The area (including adjacent gravel pits) supports Lesser Nighthawk, Greater Roadrunner, Costa’s Hummingbird, Cactus Wren, Loggerhead Shrike, as well as several other sensitive vertebrates nearly gone from the Los Angeles Area, including San Diego Black-tailed Jackrabbit and probably also San Diego Horned Lizard. Hansen Dam also supports a wide diversity of wintering passerines with Christmas Bird Counts typically finding over 100 species. Recent developments such as the construction of a large golf course have already reduced the amount of native vegetation and habitat considerably. Large public events at Hansen Dam like the Fourth of July celebration have also put stress on local wildlife.

We strongly oppose the first choice of siting for the multiple use equestrian park (as indicated in the Warhorse and Militaria Foundation Project Description) because the area east of the Edison power lines contains some of the last remnants of alluvial sage scrub habitat in Los Angeles County. This habitat may be representative of the historical vegetation which covered the alluvial fan across the eastern San Fernando Valley and is comprised of chaparral yucca, prickly pear cactus, cholla and elderberry. Alluvial Sage Scrub Habitat supports numerous native butterflies and invertebrates, as well as the endangered Least Bell’s Vireo and the endangered California Gnatcatcher. It also is breeding territory for Cactus Wrens.

On April 19, Kimball Garrett, Ornithology Curator of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History led a Los Angeles Audubon and San Fernando Valley Audubon Hansen Dam Task Force to tour the multiple use equestrian park project site as defined in the War Horse and Militaria Foundation’s own project description. The team also included the Executive Director of Los Angeles Audubon, Garry George and San Fernando Valley Audubon Co- Conservation Chair Kris Ohlenkamp. This survey found that the area to the East of the Edison right of way is excellent alluvial sage scrub habitat. Our team observed nesting pairs of cactus wrens in the project area, as well as an endangered California Gnatcatcher and an endangered Least Bell’s Vireo within a few hundred yards of the proposed project area. It is our belief that increased equestrian and human activities could affect the adjacent alluvial scrub habitat outside the project area.

In conclusion, we find that the first choice of the project area is improper, as it would impair and degrade unique and irreplaceable habitat, while jeopardizing endangered species. We urge you to require that an Environmental Impact Report be required for this project and to support the War Horse and Militaria’s second choice of project area, across from the Hansen Dam Sports Area.

Sincerely,

Seth Shteir, Vice President
San Fernando Valley Audubon

Garry George, Executive Director
Los Angeles Audubon

To All Who Know the Sepulveda Basin Wildlife Refuge…

Thursday, April 17th, 2008

The threat to our lovely Wildlife Area continues.  Your help is crucial!

Caltrans has just released a Draft Environmental Assessment/Initial Study (DEA/IS) on various alternatives for improving the connector from the southbound I-405 to the westbound US-101.  A new connector road is being proposed from the southbound 405 to the northbound 101.  Four alternative versions of the project are being considered.  Alternatives 2 or 3 would result in an on- and off-ramp being built in the Wildlife Reserve north of Burbank Blvd., west of the dam wall.

Please attend the public hearing on Wednesday May 14, 2008 from 5:30PM to 8:30PM at Valley Beth Shalom, 15739 Ventura Blvd., Encino.    

It is crucial that supporters show up to communicate their support for the Wildlife Reserve; that putting a freeway on- and off-ramp through the Reserve is unacceptable. 

No preferred alternative has been selected.  The meeting will give us a chance to indicate which alternative we prefer.  The number of people indicating they find alternatives 2 and 3 totally unacceptable will make a huge difference in the final decision.

The alternatives still on the table are:

  1. A new connector from the southbound 405 to northbound 101.  The Wildlife Reserve would remain intact.  Because there would be no freeway ramps in the Wildlife Reserve, vehicles entering the southbound 405 from Burbank Blvd. would not be able to transition onto the 101.
  2. A new connector from the southbound 405 to northbound 101. A constrained (tight curve) on- and off-ramp would be built through the Wildlife Reserve, north of Burbank Blvd.  This would require building a new Burbank Blvd. bridge over the 405.
  3. Like alternative 2, but the on- and off-ramps would have a larger curve and footprint through the Wildlife Reserve.  There would not be a new Burbank Blvd. bridge.
  4. No build alternative. 

You can also send in written comments.  Caltrans is accepting public comments through May 28, 2008.  You can e-mail eduardo_aguilar@dot.ca.gov or mail Mr. Ronald Kosinski, Deputy District Director; California Department of Transportation; Division of Environmental Planning (I405/101 Connector); 100 S. Main Street – Mail Stop 16A; Los Angeles, CA 90012.

US to Ignore Environmental Laws for Border Fence

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

New York, NY-The Department of Homeland Security has announced it is bypassing environmental and land-management laws to build hundreds of miles of border fence between the United States and Mexico.

Conservation groups have said the current design amounts to an impenetrable concrete wall that would prevent wildlife from migrating and fragment habitat. Among the 30-some laws being waived are the Endangered Species Act and the National Environmental Policy Act.

Audubon president John Flicker called the plan “unprecedented and extreme.” Read his full statement here.

* * *

Congressman Raul Grijalva, AZ 7th District, has introduced HR 2593 - The Borderlands Conservation and Security Act of 2007 - to address environmental and other concerns. To assure that this bill advances, we encourage you to contact your representative and ask that s/he become a co-sponsor of the bill.

More information on the bill may be found here.

Two Major Development Projects Opposed

Friday, March 21st, 2008

The SFVAS Board of Directors has gone on record opposing two housing development projects in our territory. Here is a recent update on the progress of these projects:

1. Late last month the LA City Council voted 15-0 to take a position opposing the Newhall Ranch / Landmark Village project. Yesterday they voted unanimously to have the City Planning Department continue to monitor the proposal as it progresses through the County bureaucracy. The EIR/EIS is being amended and will be re-circulated for additional comments, probably early next year.

2. Today the LA City Council voted 10-5 to stop processing any/all application materials for the Las Lomas project. As of today, this project has been stopped! There is an expectation that the developer will sue the City to continue processing the project. However, even if that happens, and the developer wins, 13 of the 15 Council members have stated that they oppose the project and would vote against it.

As far as I can remember (30 years) these are the only 2 development projects that our Board has ever voted to oppose. It now looks like we may actually have a chance to win in both cases.

—Kris Ohlenkamp, SFVAS Conservation Co-Chair